multiplexed massively parallel shotgun sequencing assay (Sequenom)
90
Structured Review
Sequenom
multiplexed massively parallel shotgun sequencing assay
Multiplexed Massively Parallel Shotgun Sequencing Assay, supplied by Sequenom, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/multiplexed+massively+parallel+shotgun+sequencing+assay/whole+genome+massively+parallel+sequencing/10__1016_slash_j__yobg__2011__05__102-9-49-31
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Multiplexed Massively Parallel Shotgun Sequencing Assay, supplied by Sequenom, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/multiplexed+massively+parallel+shotgun+sequencing+assay/whole+genome+massively+parallel+sequencing/10__1016_slash_j__yobg__2011__05__102-9-49-31
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
multiplexed massively parallel shotgun sequencing assay - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
90/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
Sequencing:Article Title: Noninvasive detection of fetal trisomy 21 by sequencing of DNA in maternal blood: a study in a clinical setting Article Snippet: facilities.. In this study from Quebec, Canada, the authors performed computer simulations to compare 8 distinct screening algorithms (Table 1) to assess the cost effectiveness and performance of the 8 screening protocols.. The authors found that the most cost-effective protocol was contingent screening, with the combined screen being the costliest and least cost-effective approach and associated with the highest loss rate of euploid pregnancies (Table 3). Shotgun Sequencing:Article Title: Noninvasive detection of fetal trisomy 21 by sequencing of DNA in maternal blood: a study in a clinical setting Article Snippet: facilities.. In this study from Quebec, Canada, the authors performed computer simulations to compare 8 distinct screening algorithms (Table 1) to assess the cost effectiveness and performance of the 8 screening protocols.. The authors found that the most cost-effective protocol was contingent screening, with the combined screen being the costliest and least cost-effective approach and associated with the highest loss rate of euploid pregnancies (Table 3). |